18 Nov 2023
duperemove
- Find duplicate regions in files and submit
them for deduplication
duperemove options files…
duperemove
is a simple tool for finding duplicated
regions in files and submitting them for deduplication. When given a
list of files it will hash their contents and compare those hashes to
each other, finding and categorizing regions that match each other. When
given the -d
option, duperemove
will submit
those regions for deduplication using the Linux kernel FIDEDUPERANGE
ioctl.
duperemove
computes hashes for each files extents as
well as for the whole file’s content. Optionally, per-block hashes can
be computed.
duperemove
can store the hashes it computes in a
hashfile
. If given an existing hashfile,
duperemove
will only compute hashes for those files which
have changed since the last run. Thus you can run
duperemove
repeatedly on your data as it changes, without
having to re-checksum unchanged data. For more on hashfiles see the
--hashfile
option below as well as the
Examples
section.
duperemove
can also take input from the
fdupes
program, see the --fdupes
option
below.
Duperemove has two major modes of operation, one of which is a subset of the other.
When run without -d
(the default) duperemove will print
out one or more tables of matching extents it has determined would be
ideal candidates for deduplication. As a result, readonly mode is useful
for seeing what duperemove might do when run with -d
.
Generally, duperemove does not concern itself with the underlying representation of the extents it processes. Some of them could be compressed, undergoing I/O, or even have already been deduplicated. In dedupe mode, the kernel handles those details and therefore we try not to replicate that work.
This functions similarly to readonly mode with the exception that the duplicated extents found in our “read, hash, and compare” step will actually be submitted for deduplication. Extents that have already been deduped will be skipped. An estimate of the total data deduplicated will be printed after the operation is complete. This estimate is calculated by comparing the total amount of shared bytes in each file before and after the dedupe.
files
can refer to a list of regular files and
directories or be a hyphen (-) to read them from standard input. If a
directory is specified, all regular files within it will also be
scanned. Duperemove can also be told to recursively scan directories
with the -r
switch.
btrfs
and
xfs
. Use this option twice to disable the check and try to
run the ioctl anyway.
hashfile
Use a file for storage of hashes instead of memory. This option
drastically reduces the memory footprint of duperemove and is
recommended when your data set is more than a few files large.
Hashfiles
are also reusable, allowing you to further reduce
the amount of hashing done on subsequent dedupe runs.
If hashfile
does not exist it will be created. If it
exists, duperemove
will check the file paths stored inside
of it for changes. Files which have changed will be rescanned and their
updated hashes will be written to the hashfile
. Deleted
files will be removed from the hashfile
.
New files are only added to the hashfile
if they are
discoverable via the files
argument. For that reason you
probably want to provide the same files
list and
-r
arguments on each run of duperemove
. The
file discovery algorithm is efficient and will only visit each file
once, even if it is already in the hashfile
.
Adding a new path to a hashfile is as simple as adding it to the
files
argument.
When deduping from a hashfile, duperemove will avoid deduping files which have not changed since the last dedupe.
N
,
--batchsize=N
Run the deduplication phase every N
files newly scanned.
This greatly reduces memory usage for large dataset, or when you are
doing partial extents lookup, but reduces multithreading efficiency.
Because of that small overhead, its value shall be selected based on
the average file size and blocksize
.
The default is a sane value for extents-only lookups, while you can
go as low as 1
if you are running duperemove
on very large files (like virtual machines etc).
By default, batching is set to 1024.
fdupes
mode. With this option you can pipe the
output of fdupes
to duperemove to dedupe any duplicate
files found. When receiving a file list in this manner, duperemove will
skip the hashing phase.
--hashfile
option. Will print additional information about
each file when run with -v
.
files ..
Remove file from the db and exit. Duperemove will read the list from
standard input if a hyphen (-) is provided. Requires the
--hashfile
option.
Note:
If you are piping filenames from another
duperemove instance it is advisable to do so into a temporary file first
as running duperemove simultaneously on the same hashfile may corrupt
that hashfile.
size
N
N
Use N threads for CPU bound tasks. This is used by the duplicate extent finding stage. Default is automatically detected based on number of host cpus.
Note:
Hyperthreading can adversely affect performance of
the extent finding stage. If duperemove detects an Intel CPU with
hyperthreading it will use half the number of cores reported by the
system for cpu bound tasks.
options
Comma separated list of options which alter how we dedupe. Prepend ‘no’ to an option in order to turn it off.
Duperemove can often find more dedupe by comparing portions of
extents to each other. This can be a lengthy, CPU intensive task so it
is turned off by default. Using --batchsize
is recommended
to limit the negative effects of this option.
The code behind this option is under active development and as a
result the semantics of the partial
argument may
change.
on
. Allow dedupe of extents within the same
file.
off
. Duperemove will only work on full file.
Both extent-based and block-based deduplication will be disabled. The
hashfile will be smaller, some operations will be faster, but the
deduplication efficiency will indeed be reduced.
hashfile
This option is primarily for testing. See the
--hashfile
option if you want to use hashfiles.
Read hashes from a hashfile. A file list is not required with this option. Dedupe can be done if duperemove is run from the same base directory as is stored in the hash file (basically duperemove has to be able to find the files).
hashfile
This option is primarily for testing. See the
--hashfile
option if you want to use hashfiles.
Write hashes to a hashfile. These can be read in at a later date and deduped from.
-v
if selected.
N
--io-threads
above.
PATTERN
duperemove --exclude "/path/to/dir/file*" /path/to/dir
Dedupe the files in directory /foo, recurse into all subdirectories. You only want to use this for small data sets:
duperemove -dr /foo
Use duperemove with fdupes to dedupe identical files below directory foo:
fdupes -r /foo | duperemove --fdupes
Duperemove can optionally store the hashes it calculates in a hashfile. Hashfiles have two primary advantages - memory usage and re-usability. When using a hashfile, duperemove will stream computed hashes to it, instead of main memory.
If Duperemove is run with an existing hashfile, it will only scan
those files which have changed since the last time the hashfile was
updated. The files
argument controls which directories
duperemove will scan for newly added files. In the simplest usage, you
rerun duperemove with the same parameters and it will only scan changed
or newly added files - see the first example below.
Dedupe the files in directory foo, storing hashes in foo.hash. We can run this command multiple times and duperemove will only checksum and dedupe changed or newly added files:
duperemove -dr --hashfile=foo.hash foo/
Don’t scan for new files, only update changed or deleted files, then dedupe:
duperemove -dr --hashfile=foo.hash
Add directory bar to our hashfile and discover any files that were recently added to foo:
duperemove -dr --hashfile=foo.hash foo/ bar/
List the files tracked by foo.hash:
duperemove -L --hashfile=foo.hash
Yes. To be specific, duperemove does not deduplicate the data itself. It simply finds candidates for dedupe and submits them to the Linux kernel FIDEDUPERANGE ioctl. In order to ensure data integrity, the kernel locks out other access to the file and does a byte-by-byte compare before proceeding with the dedupe.
Yes. The Linux kernel deals with the actual data. On Duperemove’ side, a transactional database engine is used. The result is that you should be able to ctrl-c the program at any point and re-run without experiencing corruption of your hashfile. In case of a bug, your hashfile may be broken, but your data never will.
Duperemove by default works on extent granularity. What this means is if there are two files which are logically identical (have the same content) but are laid out on disk with different extent structure they won’t be deduped. For example if 2 files are 128k each and their content are identical but one of them consists of a single 128k extent and the other of 2 * 64k extents then they won’t be deduped. This behavior is dependent on the current implementation and is subject to change as duperemove is being improved.
Deduplication will lead to increased fragmentation. The blocksize chosen can have an effect on this. Larger blocksizes will fragment less but may not save you as much space. Conversely, smaller block sizes may save more space at the cost of increased fragmentation.
Duperemove will print out an estimate of the saved space after a dedupe operation for you.
You can get a more accurate picture by running ‘btrfs fi df’ before and after each duperemove run.
Be careful about using the ‘df’ tool on btrfs - it is common for space reporting to be ‘behind’ while delayed updates get processed, so an immediate df after deduping might not show any savings.
At the moment duperemove can detect that some underlying extents are shared with other files, but it can not resolve which files those extents are shared with.
Imagine duperemove is examining a series of files and it notes a shared data region in one of them. That data could be shared with a file outside of the series. Since duperemove can’t resolve that information it will account the shared data against our dedupe operation while in reality, the kernel might deduplicate it further for us.
This is a little complicated, but it comes down to a feature in Btrfs called bookending. The Btrfs wiki explains this in detail.
Essentially though, the underlying representation of an extent in Btrfs can not be split (with small exception). So sometimes we can end up in a situation where a file extent gets partially deduped (and the extents marked as shared) but the underlying extent item is not freed or truncated.
Duperemove is fast at reading and cataloging data. Dedupe runs will
be memory limited unless the --hashfile
option is used.
--hashfile
allows duperemove to temporarily store
duplicated hashes to disk, thus removing the large memory overhead and
allowing for a far larger amount of data to be scanned and deduped.
Realistically though you will be limited by the speed of your disks and
cpu. In those situations where resources are limited you may have
success by breaking up the input data set into smaller pieces.
When using a hashfile, duperemove will only store duplicate hashes in memory. During normal operation then the hash tree will make up the largest portion of duperemove memory usage. As of Duperemove v0.11 hash entries are 88 bytes in size. If you know the number of duplicate blocks in your data set you can get a rough approximation of memory usage by multiplying with the hash entry size.
Actual performance numbers are dependent on hardware - up to date testing information is kept on the duperemove wiki (see below for the link).
Hashfiles are essentially sqlite3 database files with several tables, the largest of which are the files and extents tables. Each extents table entry is about 72 bytes though that may grow as features are added. The size of a files table entry depends on the file path but a good estimate is around 270 bytes per file. The number of extents in a data set is directly proportional to file fragmentation level.
If you know the total number of extents and files in your data set then you can calculate the hashfile size as:
Hashfile Size = Num Hashes * 72 + Num Files * 270
Using a real world example of 1TB (8388608 128K blocks) of data over 1000 files:
8388608 * 72 + 270 * 1000 = 755244720 or about 720MB for 1TB spread over 1000 files.
Note that none of this takes database overhead into account.
Deduplication is currently only supported by the btrfs
and xfs
filesystem.
The Duperemove project page can be found on github
There is also a wiki
hashstats(8)
filesystems(5)
btrfs(8)
xfs(8)
fdupes(1)
ioctl_fideduprange(2)